Three years is the same thing as forever when we are talking about presidential elections, and anyone who allegedly "knows" that we are going to see a Warren Insurgency or a Clinton Coronation® the next time around is patently full of shit. Sure, pundits are expected to punditize endlessly, but the only way they can punditize for three long years over shit they don't know about is to recycle lots of stale, tired clichés that tell us more about the pundits' personal prejudices than they do about the candidates. Okay, I assume Hillary Clinton will run for President in 2016. And while I wish her no ill will, what happens if, say, she gets sick? She'll be 68 then, and while that's not super-old for our times, hey, sometimes people over 65, they get sick. And I suppose Elizabeth Warren has entertained a presidential run---just about every US Senator has, at one time or another---but who's to say she won't have some religious epiphany, convert to Buddhism, shave her head and retire to a monastery? Anything is possible between now and then, and for that reason, nothing should surprise us. But the whole "populist" versus "pragmatist" horse-race bullshit is, of course, utterly devoid of meaning.
----
Baron V